Our Company
Home : Company : The Q'Straint Blog

qblog_banner

The Q'Straint Blog

Welcome to our blog section: The Q'Blog.

In the Q'Blog, we hope to write about anything and everything as it relates to wheelchair passenger securement. Do you have an idea for an article, or a question we can address? Feel free to comment on one of our articles or contact us. Enjoy!

It’s time for an about-face in thinking when it comes to wheelchair restraint systems in U.S.-based transit systems. Literally. For decades now, forward-facing safety restraints have been the de rigueur standard. Q’Straint delivers wheelchair passenger safety solutions in more than 50 countries around the world, however, where the standard is the just the opposite.

At APTA in October, we unveiled the Quantum - an innovative solution that we hope will raise awareness of the advantages of the rear-facing setup. Such a turnaround in the way wheelchair-mobile passengers are transported augments their safety and reduces time, effort and costs for public and private transit operators. But more importantly, it strictly adheres to ADA, CSA, and ISO standards while preserving the dignity and independence of the disabled.

Right now, when passengers in a wheelchair want to board a city bus, they must turn their chairs around. The driver must come and safely position the passenger in a forward-facing position and secure the restraints. Our new system will be a breakthrough in terms of eliminating driver interaction. Adopting this approach will lessen the incidence of securement mistakes and cut down on the liability transit operators face.

Around the world, transit systems in the Europe, Asia, and Latin America acknowledge that rear-faced seating is the safest direction for large vehicle transport. Crash test analyses show that most crashes are frontal. The impact from these crashes will send a wheelchair-mobile passenger lunging forward. In the case of a collision, or even a hard brake, forward-facing wheelchair passengers can and often do fall from their chairs.
By restraining chairs to face the back, the impact sends the passengers’ bodies into the supportive surface of the chair behind them. The same logic applies to rear-facing infant car seats. This logic saves lives and prevents injury, not to mention reduces city bus idle times, and promotes independence with wheelchair passengers.

There’s some natural resistance, to be sure. Rear-facing passengers will not be able to see their upcoming stop, but even the most basic public transit systems have auditory and visual alerts for upcoming stops. Facing a different direction is not an issue for the millions of public transit riders in New York City, Washington, DC, Los Angeles, Chicago and Atlanta. They ride facing every which direction each day. Seats are positioned to maximize space, which is another advantage of the Q’Straint product. Staying within the space requirements of the ADA, our rear-facing restraint system will take up less room so transit operators can safely accommodate more people.

It’s a win-win solution, and we’re proud to be pioneering in this area. Stay tuned.

“Never mix, never worry,” goes one old adage embraced by serious drinkers. With the merger of Q’Straint and Sure-Lok, such advice is a reliable rule of thumb for those tempted to mix and match products from the companies.
 
Why the cautionary note concerning two companies who have pioneered safety innovations that are now industry standards?
 
Actually, it’s simple.
 
Both Q’Straint and Sure-Lok have been the market leaders because of our extensive crash testing with verified independent labs. Every fitting, component, belt, piece or other assembly has been tested so that we know the product we are selling exceeds our company standards. The problem with mixing the systems is this: They haven’t been tested together.
 
We can equip you with a Titan automatic retractor with combination lap and shoulder belt for L-Track knowing it’s been tested. Likewise, our QRT MAX with the Slide N’ Click fitting has undergone many tests in different configurations. We know we can offer those complete product lines to our customers with total confidence.
 
So why not just test each product and be done with it? As American humorist H. L. Mencken once said, “For every problem there is a solution that is simple, neat . . . and wrong.”
 
If it only took a few tests to guarantee safety when mixing Q’Straint and Sure-Lok products, it’s a task that would be checked “completed”. However, it gets complicated when you multiply several retractable or manual tie-downs by several fittings, and many lap and shoulder belt combinations, height adjusters, track solutions and other custom options.
 
What’s important to keep in mind is that, until recently, Q’Straint and Sure-Lok were separate companies. It’s not a question of whether our L-Track fittings are compatible (they are) or of product strength (they all meet standardized testing regulations), but of crash testing and documentation.  For now, keeping Q’Straint and Sure-Lok products separate is the recommended way to go as we get to know each other and find ways to improve your customer experience.
 
If this sounds like a focus on safety that borders on obsession, we’ll gladly plead guilty. Our approach to product development has been central to our success: Innovate, test, and  bring our customers the absolute safest and best. Always.
 
So be safe, and don’t mix and drive. And stay tuned for the next wave of great wheelchair passenger safety solutions from Q’Straint and Sure-Lok.

DSC01564On the morning of Tuesday January 11th, our distributor, Tramanco, in Brisbane, Australia was hit with major flooding. During the severe storm, the Wivenhoe Dam had reached capacity and was threatening to collapse. In order to avoid a larger disaster the floodgates were opened, resulting in major flooding.

All of us at Q’Straint were shocked to hear that their building was submerged under 17 feet (5.2 meters) of water and it took more than 4 days before the waters began to recede.

Perhaps what was amazing is how Roger and Judith Sack responded. It’s quite difficult to put such an amazing story on paper when you aren’t really sure where to start rebuilding. Needless to say, we are extremely proud of what Roger and Judith have been able to overcome and wish to share their letter on Q’Straint’s Blog for all the world to see. Click here to open the .PDF!
There has been a lot of publicity regarding WC19 wheelchairs. Along with this standard comes WC18  – which is one of the many regulations that govern Q’Straint and other manufacturers of wheelchair tie-down and occupant restraint systems (WTORS). As we approach the start of a 3 year timeframe, requiring compliance, we are proud to see so many wheelchair manufacturers climb on board this standard and offer crash-tested WC19 wheelchairs.

We will have much more to say about the revised WC18 standards when the time comes to put the regulations into effect, sometime towards the end of 2011. In the meantime, we were quite happy to be featured in an article by our friends at STN Magazine (School Transportation News) which explains the various regulations (WC18, WC19, WC20, etc…) in an article titled “Alphanumeric Soup Spells Out Revised Wheelchair Standards”. The article ‘spells’ out the differences between the various RESNA standards, which sooner or later everybody will know about.

A special thanks goes out to the publishers at School Transportation News (STNonline.com). Their article can be viewed here.

Q’Straint

At the University of Michigan, an impact sled ‘rebounds’ to create a 30-mph change in velocity to simulate a severe frontal crash. With the Q’Straint Wheelchair Securements intact and still functional at the completion of this test, it’s yet another success to add to our extensive list. And while 30 mph might sound slower than a Sunday drive with the grandparents; the reality is that this 30 mph / 20 G test is more severe than it seems.

Even with vehicles traveling at high speeds, statistics tell us that a 30 mph (48 kph) change in speed during a frontal crash is more severe than 95% of all accidents. A myriad of engineered crumple zones, impact absorbing elements and other vehicle components also lie between the occupant and the incoming object. So forces in a 30 mph crash would therefore be lessened in the real world, especially with larger vehicles. However, the sled and surrogate wheelchair used in this test are made of rigid steel and absorb virtually none of the impact, which is a fancy way of saying that the full effect of the impact is felt on our tiedowns.

The equally important (and often over-looked) measurement of this standard are the G forces. Had most of us paid attention during physics class; we might remember that 1 G is basically the mass of an object at sea level. To comply with the testing standard, the crash test must register 20 G at the sled level, which increases the mass of the rigid surrogate chair and crash-test dummy by more than 20 times. Higher up, away from the platform toward the dummy’s head, more G forces can be registered (50+). Even in serious car crashes, forces such as these are extremely rare.

So, if you happen to hear about a 30 mph / 20 G crash test, don’t think it’s too slow to make you feel good about your wheelchair securement system.  Always demand updated crash testing from your wheelchair securement manufacturer. And remember, it’s not just the speed of the 30, it’s also the force of the 20 that can give you peace of mind.

Q’Straint